pioneer-theatre-company

‘A CASE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD’ IS ACTUALLY A CASE FOR FRIENDSHIP AT PTC (REVIEW)

| Rachel's Reviews

As someone who struggles with titles to draw people to my reviews and other content I recognize the temptation of a catchy title. However, one has to be careful not to set audiences up for something one can’t deliver on. Such is the problem facing playwright Samuel D Hunter and his bombastically titled play A Case for the Existence of God that just opened in the Meldrum theatre from Pioneer Theatre Company. That’s not to say this play is bad, it’s actually quite good but the title is frustrating.

A better title for this play would be ‘Toxic Masculinity’ or ‘Two Dudes in America’ or even ‘Mortgage Lending.’ I am sure Hunter has all kinds of reasons why he brings God into the title but it sets up audience for a religious themed show- something that is on the constant minds of Utah residents and then doesn’t deliver hardly at all. I suppose this subversion could be effective in surprising audiences but I just found it frustrating because I was disappointed for no reason.

Anyway, what we do get is a nice friendship story that is quite effective (hence my frustration.) The play is about 2 men Ryan played by Lee Osorio and Keith played by Jon Hudson Odom. Ryan is an alpha redneck male looking to buy a plot of land and Keith is a gay single foster dad who is a mortgage broker trying to help Ryan. We then see their relationship evolve as the lending process proves to be quite lengthy.

Osorio and Odom are excellent in their roles commanding the stage and having a believable chemistry together. The dialogue by Hunter feels authentic and genuine and I was engaged by their discussion. I am glad Hunter kept things as a friendship story as particularly with men I don’t think that relationship is explored enough especially 2 men supporting their roles as fathers.

The production itself is simple and it may have been more at home in a black box (I’m not sure why the Meldrum has only been used for 2-person small productions so far. It’s a great space. Let’s see it used to its potential! Also the chairs in the Meldrum are so comfortable.) Director Timothy Douglas keeps things simple and lets the 2 men do their jobs. The set is an office cubicle which for this remote worker can be nightmare fuel but it is highly relatable and a good choice. There are a few surprises with projections and lighting I won’t spoil towards the end but this is all about our two men (not God) and their friendship. Sometimes simple is best and that’s the case with this play.

In the end in spite of its convoluted title A Case for the Existence of God is a play any theatre lover will enjoy. The acting is excellent and it will make you want to call the Ryans and Keiths in your life to check in and make sure they are doing alright. We all need to take better care of our friends and this is a call to do so. I’d say definitely worth a ticket. A Case for the Existence of God plays through April 12th and tickets can be purchased here.

Today I give my thoughts on the poorly titled but excellent new play at Pioneer Theatre Company- A Case for the Existence of God

If you enjoy my writing and would like me to review your production I’d love to. I also have a patreon which is a great way to support my shorter logs for shows I don’t get to review. I have some really fun perks. Please take a look here.

‘SOUVENIR’ HITS THE RIGHT NOTE AT PTC (REVIEW)

| Rachel's Reviews

As I stepped away from the Meldrum Theatre on Saturday, after having seen Pioneer Theatre Company’s production of Souvenir, I found myself wondering about the universality of the piece. What would happen if Florence Foster Jenkins lived today? Would she be the subject of derision and bullied away from singing or would she be an even bigger figure? Who knows? Would Florence and her terrible singing be a tiktok phenomenon in 2024? Maybe she was the Rebecca Black or William Hung of the 1930s? It’s interesting because we like to think we have progressed so much over the years but maybe we laughed at bad singing then and we laugh at it now?

Regardless, I like a play that makes me think without being heavy-handed or dogmatic and the Souvenir does just that. It’s also a welcome relief from the holiday fare (which I know I’m the queen of Christmas but it’s nice for some variety as well!) In the production Linda Mugleston plays Florence Foster Jenkins masterfully with a moral ambiguity that keeps us constantly guessing as an audience. How self-aware is she? We don’t know and I like that. The play’s author Stephen Temperley gives Florence one moment of shame or embarrassment but for the most part she doesn’t seem to hear the problems (or perceived problems) in her voice. Indeed, this does seem accurate to the actual historical figure who really did perform at Carnegie Hall despite audiences uproariously laughing harder at her than they did at actual clowns. One critic after this concert said “Florence indulged last night in one of the weirdest mass jokes New York has ever seen.” That’s what made me wonder. Is not most of tiktok a weird mass joke?

If one isn’t fascinated by modern comparisons there should still be plenty to entertain in Souvenir. Temperley’s script is consistently witty and both Mugleston and Bob Walton, who plays her pianist Cosme McMoon, are very funny together and have a wonderful friendship chemistry. It’s nice director Wes Grantom gives us a version of Mugleston singing correctly at the end so we see what a performance it was for her to sing all those bad notes all that time. I bet singing badly is even more difficult as a performer than singing accurately when you have the correct ability.

The costumes by KL Alberts are also excellent especially when they are quickly switched out for the concerts. For the big Carnegie Hall sequence she goes from being a bar wench to an angel, to the Queen of the Night. All the other aspects of the production were simple but excellent allowing us to focus on the actors, their immersive performances, and the message of the play.

If I was going to nitpick I don’t think they really needed to have prerecorded audience sounds at various scenes. It felt a little like an unnecessary laugh track in a sitcom. We are the audience and provided plenty of laughter and other responses to what was happening on stage.

If one is comparing this production to the film from 2016 with Meryl Streep the big difference is the film includes her common law husband St Clair Bayfield played by Hugh Grant. Because of the transactional aspect of their relationship it gives the movie a more melancholy tone than the play but Florence’s character is essentially the same as I think that was her real-life persona. I enjoyed the film (gave it an A back in 2016) but had more fun with this play.

Still, if looking to have a delightful night of theatre than head over PTC for their production of Souvenir. It’s not only a terrific comedy about a real-life person but it might make one think a bit like it did for me. If it does I’d love to hear other’s thoughts in the comments. It’s after all what Florence would have wanted!

If you enjoy my writing and would like me to review your production I’d love to. I also have a patreon which is a great way to support my shorter logs for shows I don’t get to review. I have some really fun perks. Please take a look here.

‘PRAYER FOR THE FRENCH REPUBLIC’ AT PTC CANT RECOVER FROM A BLOATED SCRIPT (REVIEW)

| Rachel's Reviews

When I was setting up this site I was very thoughtful about the scoring ruberic I would use. At first I considered the smile and frown worthy system I have for movie reviews (for that site), however since I review so much community theater giving anyone a frown didn’t feel right. What I came up with instead was ‘go see it’ and ‘not for me’ and the latter is how I feel about today’s play. Prayer for the French Republic is not a bad play and will probably resonate with many theatregoers. Indeed much about the production at Pioneer Theatre Company is praiseworthy and handsomely mounted but it is definitely not for me. It might be for you, and I celebrate that but let’s talk about why the experience was not as edifying as I might have hoped.

To begin with I do admire PTC artistic director Karen Azenberg’s ambition for adding such a fresh and difficult to market play into their season. The length and topics discussed are not going to be for the average casual theatregoer and that’s what keeps people coming back to PTC time and again. It may not have paid off for me but I do appreciate big swings and that’s what they took. She also directed the production which was effective in spite of its many moving pieces.

The cast is all uniformly strong with Salt Lake royalty Jayne Luke stealing every scene she is in as the 1944 section of the script. I just saw her in Arsenic and Old Lace and it was delightful to see a totally different type of character from such a talented actress. I also enjoyed Kim Taff as 2016 daughter Elodie Benhamou. She has a monologue to open Act 2 which while it goes on far too long was delivered with a dry sense of humor. None of the actors attempt a French accent which I found surprising but I guess that was the case with the Broadway play as well.

The set by Bryce Cutler is also very impressive with them creating a kind of black box on stage with black curtains surrounding an apartment framed in by a white box with lighted walls going way high into skies. They also used the middle of the stage to swap out different apartments creating the 1944 vs 2016 settings including at different points a bedroom, a full kitchen and more.

My problem with Prayer for the French Republic comes down to Joshua Harmon’s script. It’s not just that it is 3 hours with 2 intermissions (I enjoyed The Lehman Trilogy at PTC last year that’s also long with 3 acts.) The problem is the flipping back and forth between the 2 eras makes it difficult to invest fully in the narratives of the characters. This is especially a shame with the 1944 section because the perspective of a post-Holocaust Jewish family is interesting and one I haven’t seen much of in theatre or film. I have felt the same way in other split time narratives like The Joy Luck Club (book and film) where the modern section feels so much less compelling than the older one. Why does it seem like modern characters spend most of their time in these narratives complaining? This is exemplified by Elodie’s monologue which while funny did become ponderous after a while.

The whole play feels bloated and to use a pedestrian term frankly boring. Particularly the modern characters aren’t sharing authentic experiences but are speechifying to each other and to the audience, which again, becomes tedious and bland. I know it was a very successful play on Broadway and has a lot of fans but at least in this iteration it did not work for me, and I left feeling more tired than intrigued. Others mileage on Prayer for the French Republic may vary so if it sounds intriguing check it out. It is playing at PTC until Nov 9th and tickets can be purchased here.

If you enjoy my writing and would like me to review your production I’d love to. I also have a patreon which is a great way to support my shorter logs for shows I don’t get to review. I have some really fun perks. Please take a look here.